'Antigone – Justice Essay\r'

'â€Å"Justice is like the moguldom of perfection; it is not without us as a f play, it is inwardly us as a great yearning. ” The flightiness of notwithstandingice strongly resonates to what was mentioned in this quote by George Eliot. We all desire to live in a world that is fair and just merely it is just beyond human’s aptitude because in that respect argon always two sides to every termination and in that respect is neer complete umpire for both. any individual strive to look at justice for assorted intentions and those in big businessman often exploit the constitution of justice to mask their wickedness.\r\nIn this prevailing civilization, there is no doubt that polices ar enforced by people at the top of the social hierarchy. muckle of authority ordain establish laws that seem to be un twineed and fair in their eyes, believing that this is in the best interest of the country, unless in positive fact it is far from that. An example of such a situation is present in the Ancient classic tragedy, written by Sophocles, â€Å"Antigone”. In the play the order of magnitude given out by the new king Creon only served himself as it makes it illegal for Ismene and Antigone to burry and pay back the br new(prenominal), Polynices for the very last time.\r\nCreon wanted to have the sensory faculty of control over the city of Thebes,thus enforcing the law without contemplating the views of the family members as well as the citizens as it was stated by the chorus saying â€Å"But he that, alike rashly daring, walks in sin”. â€Å"I do not defy them; but I cigarettenot act Against the State. I am not strong generous”. Ismene, as much as she wanted to award the brother, she could not. Creon despite knowing the importance of a pro forma burial for the Greeks, he chastised Antigone and Ismene for breaking the law.\r\nIt is hard for leadership to genuinely apprehend the privation of the people them. Thus, la ws that are introduced are predominantly to the benefit of those in power. The arranging of justice allows the majority to create the terms of justice and the ethics of the minorities will usually be do by as less significant, or completely disregarded. This can be seen in many societies with controversial issues. euthanasia is a good example.\r\nThe majority in Rusia,United commonwealth and Australia agrees that euthanasia is wrong and laws to punish those who assist others in suicide were instigated . In the case of Terri Schiavo who was a 41-year-old disenable woman in Florida was severely disabled for over 15 years, and been diagnosed as being in a persistent vegetative . Due to the money and post this family had, they were able to carry out euthanasia but there were many cases where people were left to keep up and die naturally because they were underprivileged.\r\nPower and money governs the form of the world. Therefore, justice, being a fragment of the system, attends t hose of influence. In the organisational realm, authorized professional who are part of the governing body of legislations are also those who have the power over the final verdict. The ultimate guessment in a court should be carried out by professionals who are chaste and neutral and not those who are a part of the making of the laws because their mind sets will alternate to be influenced and skewed to their own likeness.\r\nThis was shown in â€Å"Antigone” where the law was essentially created by Creon but he withal had the highest power to decide whether Antigone and Ismene was going to punished or to be exonerated. And because Creon was so obsessed with the law that he created he made a very bias move by not looking at this situation from other perspectives but instead say â€Å" Take them, and keep them within- The proper place for women”. If the power of making the final decision was given to other people instead of Creon, Antigone and Ismene’s fate could have been altered.\r\nIndeed justice will place those in power as the priority if the people who judge had only one outlook. â€Å"Justice is sweet and melodious; but injustice is harsh and discordant”. However, as much as human beings, especially the government aspire to be just and nondiscriminatory, it is impossible, because, justice is never an end to itself. Impartiality and justice is what we hope for but the truth is, nothing can gratify two parties and in most instances, the ones in supremacy will be at the winning end. This is an irrefutable, sad worldly concern that we have no choice but to stretch out it.\r\n'