Socrates Beliefs And Philosophical Statements

Socrates Beliefs And Philosophical StatementsAccording to the Athenians, Socrates was an ugly small-arm. One who walked through the city and impoverished authoritative figures in public places with m each slew around. Mevery would enjoin that he made the weaker tune stronger. Throughout Socrates support, he was al focal blames looking for equity. Socrates went some his flavour-time following his ways, questioning people active their own beliefs, until he was brought to trial by a group of men on the charges of corrupting the youth and impiety. When looking at Socrates carriage, one of the more or less important and signifi kittyt quotes from Socrates is The unexamined life story is non worth living. We argon able to understand the meaning of this quote by first looking at Socrates doctrine. When analysing his philosophical system, using Platos Apology, we are able to divide it into common chord main rives, Socratic jeering, system and ethos. In the first secti on of my quiz I impart explain these three components of Socrates philosophical system and show how these components are related to the statement The unexamined life is non worth living. In the second part of my essay, I go forth proceed to talk or so my own philosophy and how I disagree with Rauhuts explanation of philosophy.In the first section, I will bulge out by talking close Socratic irony. Much of Socrates beliefs and philosophic statements are very ironic. For example, when the Oracle of Delphi says that Socrates is the wisest man in Athens and Socrates does not understand why. Socrates goes about figuring out why the Oracle would say this by finding others in higher standing, the professionals and asking those people questions about themselves and their spangledge. Socrates would quiz them and try to cook whether he felt they were wise. He would also ask whether they thought of themselves as wise. Most would claim that yes they were then wise, but Socrates did not feel that any of them they were. Later, Socrates decides that he is indeed the wisest man in Athens because he knows that he is not wise. People that think they are wise are not because they indeed know nothing. Socrates knows that he knows nothing and comes to the conclusion that he is the wisest man in all Athens because he knows that he knows nothing. How can someone be the wisest man in Athens and still know nothing? Socrates beliefs and philosophical statements are comprised of contradictory statements that to many of the people of Athens, made no sense. I thought this man mastermed to be wise both to many others and especially to himself, but he was not and then I time-tested to show him that he thought he was wise, but was not. (Plato, 507) Socrates trial itself is ironic in a way as well. He was accused of being a corruptor of the youth and impiety. As far as impiety goes, Socrates claimed that he was carrying out the will of the gods. Impiety is the lack of respect o r concern for Athenian gods and match to Socrates he was carrying out the gods will, implying that he is all told pious. When looking at the accusation, his accusers claim that he is corrupting the youth. Socrates refutes this pipeline by stating that he did not corrupt the youth of Athens because he had no intentions of doing so. In regularise to corrupt someone, they must have the intentions and the knowledge, and he had neither. He is not teaching the youth of Athens anything, he is merely encouraging the knowledge which they already have to come out, which lead us into the Socratic Method.When analysing Socrates philosophy, another(prenominal) significant part of his philosophy is his method. He looked at himself not as a teacher, but as a midwife. He does not teach anyone anything they did not know already, but he, with the proper questions, is able to represent out the knowledge that they already have. In essence he is helping someone give lineage to their knowledge, hel ping to recollect the knowledge that they already have. The Socratic Method revolves mostly around question and answer. Socrates would amaze by asking what something is. For example, at the start of Socrates trial, he begins by asking for definitions of such terms as justice, piety, friendship and virtue. Beginning with the question Socrates would wait for an answer and would always be able to refute the definition because all of the definitions he receives result in contradictions. Socrates is able to, through this method of question and answer, show others about what justice is by showing them what it is not, neer coming up with what it is in a positive sense. hence Socrates is teaching someone about something without teaching them anything new about that thing. Socrates would also just question people in an ordinary conversation. Instead of just simply telling the person what he needed to ratify he would quiz them and try to get them to say the point of which he is trying to get crosswise with his questions. An example of this is in his trial when Socrates is refuting his accusation of corrupting the youth. now then, say who makes them better, inform the court who he is. You see, Meletos, you are silent, and a sufficient proof of what I am just saying, that you have cared nothing about it? Come, say, my good man, who makes them better? (Plato, 511) This process is continued and Meletos proceeds to give his explanations, but Socrates does not buy into any of them. Socrates also believed that since he was condemned to death by the court, it must have been the will of the gods that his life was to end and because of this he had refused many offers from his friends to escape Athens and live somewhere where he was welcomed by the people. This shows us that within his method of philosophy lies an ethical part which binds him to always tell the truth and not to be sinful, which is also part of his ethos.The last major part of Socrates philosophy was his ethos . He was an extremely ethical in everything he did. Socrates pass most of his life examining the lives of others. He continued to do this even though these people did not want him to do so. Going back to the Socratic Method, Socrates would typically do this using question and answer. With this method in mind, he was able to make many people, who also were people of a high standing in the political life of Athens, look wish fools in front of all of their peers. He continued to dissect these people in assay of the truth. Truth was the most important thing to Socrates and he was always trenchant for it even though it led him to his eventual death. Socrates, also, neer took any money for any of the work he did. He spent most of his life in poverty because he believed that what he was doing was not work. He never taught anybody anything. He was only helping them to remember what they had forgotten and that, to Socrates, was not work.Through understanding these three main parts of S ocrates philosophy, we are able to better understand the meaning of his statement The unexamined life is not worth living. According to his life and philosophy, if he had not gone around examining his own life and others, to him, it would not be worth living. Socratic irony helps us to understand his statement because he used this irony to help him to better understand life. Many of his ideas were ironic, but led him to a better understanding of truth. Socratic Method shows us how analytical Socrates truly is. He spends his life asking people questions and looking for answers that will help him to have a better understanding of truth. Finally Socratic ethos shows us how Socrates would continue to search for truth regardless of the consequences. Being a very philosophical man and having the desire to find truth he would not have had any value in life if he had not looked deeper than what we can see and feel. It was important to him to have a purpose in life, examine his own life and the life that many others lead and finally give others the opportunity to see the world through his eyes.At this point, I will begin by defining Rauhuts definition of philosophy and how I interpret it. I will then show how I dont completely agree with his definition and provide my own definition and what my philosophy is. I will also talk about why philosophy is important to me and a philosophical question that has troubled me in my life.We can define philosophical questions as questions that involve conceptual synopsis and that require for their solutions more than observations and experimentation. Philosophical questions are open questions in the sense that we cannot easily predict what would forge a satisfactory solution to then. No scientific procedure can produce a right away answer to philosophical questions. (Rauhut, 8 9) As stated in this quote, Rauhut proceeds to define philosophy as the study of open questions that will ultimately lead us to a better understanding of l ife and the world around us. He gives us examples of such questions and all of his questions fit into this definition. I, however, do not completely agree with his definition. Indeed most philosophical questions are open questions, but I think it goes a little further than just being open questions. Philosophy to me is studying questions that are related to life and death, what the true meaning of life is and what happens to us when we die.When looking at many philosophical questions we can see that all of these have something to do with life and death. Like many of Socratic or Platonic theories and philosophies, on that point is always something that relates to life and death. Platos theory of the Forms, Recollection and many of Socrates theories about what is a soul, the afterlife, and others are examples that relate philosophy to life and death. All of these, in one way or another relate to life and death.Although I had never really thought about it as being philosophical, I hav e always been concerned in what happens to our conscientiousness when we die. Do we continue on in some parallel plain and be happy in an afterlife or do we simply cease to exist, go on into a dreamless sleep, without any anxieties. When I start thinking about this question it baffles my brain. I couldnt imagine having a dreamless sleep for an eternity, but I cant necessarily say that there will be a definite afterlife where our conscientiousness moves on to. Socrates presents both of these arguments in The Phaedo, but he is never actually able to come up with a clear for sure result that is guaranteed to happen. Then again, no one will ever know until they die, but depending on if we slip into a dreamless sleep, we could never really know what happens to us because we will no longer be able to retain any knowledge or even be able to think. There really is no way someone could answer this question because there is no one alive that knows what happens when you die. This is a question that I am sure that many people have or will wrestle with at some point in their lives and philosophy is important because it allows people to analyze these questions and really gets them thinking about their own in the flesh(predicate) beliefs and whether or not their beliefs can really hold true for them.Thus my own definition of philosophy is the study of open questions about life and death. Philosophical questions all have some relation to life and the world around us as well as death and the afterlife. We all wrestle with questions like these, but not everyone would realize that they are thinking philosophically. Philosophy is more important to us than most people realize. In some capacity or another everyone is a philosopher and everyone comes across questions that could change their beliefs completely.